Disclaimer

Disclaimer: The information providing here is for general awareness. Author is not responsible for any consequence through use or misuse of the same. This blog is designed for general information only. The information presented at this blog should not be construed to be formal legal advice nor the formation of a lawyer/client relationship. Persons accessing this site are encouraged to seek independent counsel for advices regarding their individual legal issues.

Friday, February 18, 2011

Rejected the regularization of service.

The applicant was worked as daily wage employee from 1987 to 1995. thereafter the respondents discontinued the applicant. Earlier the applicant has approached to the Tribunal/Court for regularization of his service. The court directed the authorizes to consider his case for regularization otherwise he found eligible and qualified. In the meanwhile the Government has imposed ban on recruitment. Again he approached to the Lokadalath for regularization of his service. The Hon’ble Lokadalath has rejected and directed to the applicant to approach the Hon’ble Administrative Tribunal at Hyderabad. Filed O.A., heard at length by the Court. The Court did not accept the letter issued by the principle of Seva Mandir Residential School.
It is contended bys the respondent the there is no evidence to show the Applicant was worked in the said school. The ex-principle of the school has misrepresented to the higher authorities stating that there is no evidence to show that the applicant was worked in the school. Relining upon the information given by the principle, the Commissioner has filed a counter before the Court that there is no evidence to show that he worked in the said school. It is contended by the applicant the as per records only the said letter was issued stating that the applicant was worked from 1987 t0 1995.
But the court declined to accept the contentions raised by the applicant. In the result the O.A is dismissed no orders as to costs. The above case was argued by me on behalf of the petitioner. The applicant took steps for filing of Appeal before the High Court of A.P.

No comments: