The applicant submits that he is having a qualification of M.A. Philosophy and
APSET and secured 61% of marks and he is working as Guest Lecturer in Degree College . The applicant is fully qualified to hold the
post of Degree College Lecturer.
Therefore, he submitted an
application 15-07- 2014 to the respondents for the post of Degree College Lecturer which
is being filled up on contract basis for a period of one year. . It
is submitted that the in Zone –IV the
respondents are not following the rules for recruitment to the post Degree
College Lecturer. There are about 250 Degree College Lecturer posts., all in Zone-IV and they are being filled up on contract
basis by the persons who does not have qualification prescribed by the special
rules in G.O.Ms.No. 47 dated 14-5-2007.
But the respondents have not taken any action till today with regard to
considering the candidature of the applicant for the post of Degree College
Lecturer on contract basis. Thereby, the applicant herein is being put to
irreparable loss and not getting employment.
Inspite of having eligible person, the respondents herein are going for
renewing the contract appointment year after year with ineligible persons. Thereby depriving the applicant for the
employment, even on contract basis. After
hearing the matter, directed the respondent to consider the representation of
the applicant in residual vacancy. The above case argued by me and obtained favorable order on behalf of the
applicant.
Tuesday, August 26, 2014
Tuesday, July 1, 2014
THE MUNICIPAL NOTICE IS SET ASIDE
The Petitioner is a tenant and he
is paying rents continuously to the owner.
The owner came and requested tenant to increase rent from 4800/- to
10,000/-. The tenant has refused. Then the owner demanded to vacation of the
premises. The tenant has filed Original Suit and obtained temporary
injunction. Then Municipality Vijayawada has issued notice under section
456 HMC act 1955 on the ground that the building is in dilapidated condition with the collusion of the owner. The said notice was questioned before the Hon’ble
High Court in W.P. and the same was setasided on earlier occasion giving
liberty to the petitioner to file objections to the above said notice within a week.
Accordingly the petitioner has filed his objections within three
days. Without considering the same again
the municipality has passed an order
that as the petitioner has not filed his objections and reiterated the municipality
old order stating the petitioner has to take steps immediate vacation of the
building and strengthen the building immediately
and also further to intimate the steps taken within 3 days. The petitioner has filed W.P. questioning the
file notice dt.17-5-2014. the Hon’ble
Court while disposing the W.P. the impugned order is setaside directed the
respondents to consider the objections and pass orders thereon communicate the same to the petitioner and take
action in accordance with law at the earliest and in any event, not late than
one month from the date of receipt of a
copy of this order. The Writ petition
stands disposed of accordingly. The
above case is argued by me and obtained favorable orders for tenant.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)